SIMON MAGUS, MB BS.
Psychiatrist / University of Exeter
Psychiatrist / University of Exeter
The Place of Snakes or Seraphs?: Schizotypy, Esoteric Hermeneutics and Παράνοια
Dr Simon Magus BSc (Hons), MB BS, MA is a psychiatrist with a special interest in Early Intervention Psychosis. He studied medicine in London at Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, now part of the Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine.
After qualifying, he taught Anatomy as the Royal College Prosector to the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow, and as an associate lecturer in Anatomy and Embryology at the University of Glasgow. After initially following a neurosurgical path, he changed to psychiatry in 1996.
Simon’s interest in esotericism predates his medical studies by a number of years. He completed an MA in Western Esotericism at EXESESO, The Exeter Centre for the Study of Esotericism, the University of Exeter in 2008/9. His thesis was entitled Austin Osman Spare and the Conquest of the Imaginal: Paranoia, Metanoia and Phronesis of the Magical Mind. He is interested in the interplay of descriptive psychopathology and the phenomenology of magical praxis, and spirituality and psychosis. During his MA studies he developed broad perspectives in esotericism on subjects including alchemy and its transmission to the Latin West, Alexandrian Hermetism, and Renaissance Kabbalah. His specialist field of enquiry now centres on Victorian and Edwardian literary expressions of occultism, and he is currently reading for a PhD at Exeter, his thesis entitled Rider Haggard and the Imperial Occult: Hermetic Discourse and Romantic Contiguity.
In 1902 William James enquired in The Varieties of Religious Experience as to the reasons why some individuals found the magical and mystical in their experience of alterations in consciousness, and why some found madness: the place of seraphs or the place of snakes respectively. In the following paper I shall explore the relationship of kinship between what I shall call for convenience the ‘magical’ mind-set and the ‘paranoid’ mind-set.
I shall deploy Antonie Faivre’s original criteria for esotericism which although criticised for a long period in the Academy are now being re-evaluated in terms of the original notion of a ‘mode of thought’ − associated with his concept of l’aire de famille to denote the compass of esoteric literature − and compare these directly with the diagnostic criteria for Schizotypal Personality and Disorder as described in the DSM V and ICD10 classifications. Central to this discussion is Gordon Claridge’s original concept of schizotypy in the normative personality, and its emphasis therefore explicitly avoids pathologisation. To illustrate my arguments empirically, I shall deploy a number of clinical vignettes of case studies to illustrate the commonalities and differences between the ‘magical’ mind and the ‘paranoid’ mind, without reducing one to the other in either direction. This is in keeping with the ‘Trans’ theme of the conference as it focuses on the importance of transdisciplinarity between psychiatric and esoteric studies: I shall employ imagistic representations of the ‘mad’ and the ‘mystical’ as an important emphasis of the presentation. This approach attempts a comparative phenomenology of psychosis and quasi-psychotic phenomena as described in the language of descriptive psychopathology with that of the experience of magical and mystical praxis as documented by esoteric literature and hermeneutic methods.